Saturday, July 28, 2007
Thursday summary
Going through the material we recognized, that the combination of the three approaches could work fantastically as the basis for a first scenario. It is very useful that we have different, very interesting approaches concerning the scale and contents of investigation.
I have an appointment with the TUW people next Thursday.
So for Wednesday I would suggest,
to further develop the single ideas, this includes the kind of representation so that the TUW people can easily understand and implement. Furthermore everybody should give a remark how the single approaches could be combined.
Reinhard, please define a set of ”urban objects” with specific characteristics,
and make a proposal how to use them within a scenario or negotiation. How could one include the notion of the physical appereance?
Yue, to further develop your very precise approach, I think the next step would be to think about what it really means to define cubes with different quantums of daylight and street access. Which are the parameters that define this kind of quality? How is the orientation on site (north, south...) Which of them are variable/adjustable (max-min) and which of them are fix figures: (sun angle, distance between the building, building-heights…) Within the Viennese building code you can find some figures. Maybe Thomas can help you with it (see below).
Chingfang, thanks fort the definitions, I am waiting for your first step, so that I can react.
Miha, it would be very interesting to think about how the building masses react to the impact of “empty spaces”. Are these spaces empty by definition, or are they different kinds of (public/ open) spaces, which themselves need a certain amount of building volume.
You could give some examples how the building volume at the borders is affected by different kind of empty spaces.
Thomas, since you started with the list of possible rules, and I was told that you are keen with urban codes concerning real numbers I would suggest that you think od and summarise the interdependencies of object-object, and object-ground conditions related to the Viennese building code. Further on this could serve as a fantastic collection we can refer to.
Peter, I am waiting for your first step. The investigation in the traffic-topic is very interesting and very important. Don´t hesitate so much.
Zulfiye, are you with us? Please collect visual Material (images, aerial views, perspectives, maps …) of the Aspern site, with the limits and possibilities of the spatial representation of the colour-table in mind.
So much for now - more on Monday. It would be great if you don´t produce last minute, so that we can discuss within the process. Thanks!
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
chfwu79
Yue rules
N cubes with no day light access and no direct access to the street is object 1(color 1)
N cubes with one-side day light access and no direct access to the street is object 2A(color 2A)
N cubes with one-side day light access and direct access to the street is object 2B(color 2B)
N cubes with two-side day light access and no direct access to the street is object 3A(color 3A)
N cubes with two-side day light access and direct access to the street is object 3B(color 3B)
N cubes with three-side day light access and no direct access to the street is object 3A(color 3A)
N cubes with three-side day light access and direct access to the street is object 3B(color 3B)
N cubes with four-side day light access and no direct access to the street is object 4A(color 4A)
N cubes with four-side day light access and direct access to the street is object 4B(color 4B)
N cubes with five-side day light access and no direct access to the street is object 5A(color 5A)
N cubes with five-side day light access and direct access to the street is object 5B(color 5B)
(N can be different for every object, just stand for the number of the cubes)
then combinate these cubes, move around the objects within the aspern site and change values of the objects in the condition of the different cubes to achieve different densities
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Some rules and references
STEPS
After Friday discussion my thinking was going towards abandoning the division on regions.
I think better step is to create one topological outline of the whole area, which must have exact FAR, building coveridge value and number of building objects. This urban topology will be changing shape but always persist the same volume and number of objects.
Next step would be assigning rules to colored bodies. The rule would describe the nature of empty space between buildings, for example width and number of streets, geometry of grids, or entirely empty space etc.
In the intersection areas between radiuses of two bodies there should be description of combined empty space, for example average value of empty space…
The topology of urban space must stay the same for the whole field, but not for the radiuses of influence, they could also be without objects. That will make a tensions and dynamics in the field.
As example of urban topology I attached project from Emergent density workshop. As example of different empty spaces I attached project from Neumayr parametric workshop and Prix grids workshop.



Emergent density workshop

Emergent density workshop

Neumayr workshop

Neumayr workshop

Prix workshop

Prix workshop

Tooling (Aranda/Lasch)

Tooling (Aranda/Lasch)

Tooling (Aranda/Lasch)

Tooling (Aranda/Lasch)